![Horizon 2020]horizon2020.jpg “Horizon 2020”)
These are my notes from the “Getting ready for Horizon 2020” workshop, presented by Dr. Seán McCarthy from Hyperion Ltd at CWI on Oct 1 2012.
- Website associated with the workshop, for more information: http://www.hyperion.ie/horizon2020.htm
- There’s a ‘Horizon 2020’ group on LinkedIn
- Use http://europa.eu to follow ongoing debates on a certain topic (use Google and a conjunctive query)
- First part on the politics, made for ‘directors’ – the big picture
- Very few people aware of FP7, so first a zoom-in on these projects
- A little history (from 2000 onwards)…
- Horizon 2020 is not called FP-8, because it’s a mixture of programs, with strong links to other programs
- ‘“Innovation” will be the “new agriculture” for the next 15 years’
- H2020
- Europe 2020 Strategy: 7 flagship initiatives
- Digital agenda for Europe
- Innovation Union
- Youth on the move
- An agenda for new skills and jobs
- Resource efficient Europe
- Europe against poverty
- An industrial policy for the globalisation era
- Horizon 2020 is like taking the FP-7 LEGO blocks and reassembling them
- Separate programs
- “Innovation in SMEs” programme – valorisation
- Bring technologies to the market
- USA’s SBIR (~ “STW Valorisation”)
- KETs (Key Enabling Technologies), since 2009 already.
- http://www.hyperion.ie/ket.htm
- 6.7b EUR
- FET
- “an idea that might work or not, doesn’t matter if it doesn’t”
- e.g., wearable electronics (influence of music on physiology), nature as computing
- EIT (European Institute of Innovation and Technology) = European MIT
- Not really a programme, but it has relevant options
- “Innovation in SMEs” programme – valorisation
- Funding typically only for “Phase 1,” i.e., pre-competitive ideas/activities.
- “Funding the checking of the patent, not the filing.” Examples of pre-competitive
- Examples
- ERC
- FET
- Industrial Leadership Societal Challenges
- Eureka (actually between pre-competitive and competitive)
- technology transfer
- competitive
- EIT
- EIP (competitive)
- Bv. “Smart cities”
- H2020
- has money for VCs, covering the whole value chain
- Budget (numbers are still changing)
- ~ 87.7b EUR
- EIT interesting, see the notes and below
- Exercise: for each institute: walk through the documents and identify which programmes etc. are relevant
- Trends
- FP5-FP6-FP7-H2020: projects -> programmes
- Part II: FET
- little topic in FP-7
- Now: 3.5b EUR
- radical innovations
- FET Open
- “what you submit is submitted (no resubmissions)” Although they are pre-proposals
- FET Proactive
- FET Flagships (FuturICT, e.g.)
- two are selected: those will receive EUR 100m per year for 10 years. (But this will need to come from local governments.)
- FET Young Explorers
- SME
- EIT
- part of DG education
- 2007-2013 (309m EUR)
- 2014-2020 (3.2b EUR)
- proposed (H2020): transfer/valorisation
- Research -> industry
- 3 KICs (knowledge and innovation communities)
- research centres + universities + education (local! regional…)
- 1 of them is “EIT ICT Labs”
- 2/3 of European R&D spending in ICT
- e.g., Eindhoven: Philips + Twente + Novay + TNO-ICT.
- another is EIT Climate KIC
- e.g., Randstad
- H2020: 3 new ones (so 3.2b EUR)
- Added-value manufacturing (Key Enabling Tech)
- Smart secure societies
- Urban mobility
- “Joint programming”
- Local money, no EC involvement although they want to
- ERA-Net, ERA-Net Plus
- EU + national funding
- next ones
- urban Europe
- climate change
- microbial challenge
- aging
- water challenges
- seas and oceans
- Public procurement
- small companies can bid for small parts of projects (public tender)
- EIP (European Innovation Partnerships)
- related to the EU 2020 flagships (see above)
- Part IV – changes in H2020 from FP7
- overhead
- FP7: actual overhead
- H2020 (proposed): 20% of eligible costs
- funding
- FP7: 75% research, 50% demonstration, 100 mgmt
- H2020 (proposed): 100% research, 75% innovation
- impacts mainly SMEs, companies
- productive hours (H2020) 1680 hours per annum)
- decision expected before the end of the year
- evaluation criteria
- old
- science
- implementation
- impact
- new
- excellence
- impact
- implementation
- Open access, no time sheets
- old
- overhead
- Part V – Lobbying
- Top-down (from EU) vs bottom-up (from researchers) lobbying. How? Through ERC, research infrastructure, etc.
- “Lobbying,” i.e. the EU asks for comments on the drafts of the programme from EU researchers
- Make sure your topic is in the call (draft first and final also of course)
- Decision-making process…
- Part X – Getting ready for H2020
- Getting ready for H2020
- Different strategies, see the notes
- Getting ready for H2020
- Last part